Alternative Medicine Review 2002 (Feb); 7 (1): 4–21 ~ FULL TEXT
Kenneth A. Conklin, MD, PhD
Introduction
Interpreting Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Mediated Mechanisms
Interpreting the results of studies designed to assess the impact of
polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on chemotherapy and radiation is difficult
because PUFAs alone can affect cancer cell growth and viability. PUFAs
create oxidative stress (Table 1) in biological
systems as they undergo lipid peroxidation, forming free radicals such
as peroxyl and alkoxyl radicals. Although these lipid hydroperoxides are
relatively short-lived, their breakdown results in the formation of secondary
products of lipid peroxidation (aldehydes such as malondialdehyde and the
4-hydroxyalkenals) that are longer-lived and can attack a variety of cellular
targets.
Low concentrations of these aldehydes affect the cell cycle (Figure
1) in ways that reduce the rate of cell proliferation. These effects
include inhibiting the transition of cells from the G0 phase to the G1
phase, prolonging the G1 phase, slowing progression through the S phase
by inhibiting the activity of DNA polymerases, inhibiting cell cycle progression
through the restriction point, and causing arrest at cycle cell checkpoints. [1,2]
These effects that retard cell cycle progression will impact proliferating
cells such as those in culture and those of certain animal tissues, including
neoplasms, bone marrow, and the intestinal epithelium. Whereas low-level
PUFA-induced oxidative stress is cytostatic, higher levels of oxidative
stress result in apoptosis (programmed cell death), and still higher levels
cause cellular necrosis. [3-5]
Many investigators have demonstrated that omega-6 (n-6) and omega-3
(n-3) PUFAs including linoleic acid (LA), gamma-linolenic acid (GLA),
dihommogamma-linolenic acid (DGLA), arachidonic acid (AA), alpha-linolenic
acid (ALA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)
inhibit growth and are cytotoxic to cancer cells in vitro; [6-15]
that the effects are associated with the production of lipid peroxides
and aldehydes; [8-13] and that the cytotoxicity of the added PUFAs
is reduced by the addition of antioxidants. [8-13] Studies with
laboratory animals have also demonstrated that feeding a diet containing
peroxidation products of fish oil1 [6] reduces tumor growth, and
that the effect is reduced by administering antioxidants. [17,18]
However, the effects in vitro are observed at PUFA concentrations (30
microM and above in most studies) exceeding normal plasma free fatty acid
(FFA) levels. PUFAs in culture medium undergo lipid peroxidation more readily
than those of plasma or tissues because: (1) culture medium, compared to
plasma, contains lower levels of albumin that binds FFAs [19] and
sequesters iron and copper that promote lipid peroxidation; (2) culture
medium generally contains fewer antioxidants than plasma; (3) PUFAs in
plasma lipoproteins are protected by antioxidants within the lipoproteins;
and (4) cellular PUFAs are protected from lipid peroxidation by multiple
antioxidants. Additionally, growth inhibition in vitro does not necessarily
correlate with the degree of lipid peroxidation [13] and antioxidants
preventing lipid peroxidation in vitro do not completely reverse the effects
of certain PUFAs on cell growth. [11,12,14]
Researchers found that administering LA without antioxidants also reverses
the suppressive effects of fish oil on the growth of colon adenocarcinoma
in mice. [20] Further research has found that preventing lipid
peroxidation in experimental diets by the addition of antioxidants does
not interfere with the growth inhibitory effects of fish oil on primary
tumor growth or the development of metastases in nude mice with transplanted
human breast and prostate cancer cells. [21-23] These results suggest
PUFAs are cytostatic and cytotoxic in vitro and in vivo when conditions
allow lipid peroxidation to occur, but that certain PUFAs in the absence
of oxidative stress also have inhibitory effects on tumor cell growth.