Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PMC full text:

Table 3

Multivariable associations between the clinical assessment items and sciatica for model (i) and model (ii).
Item variableModel (i)Model (ii)
BetaOR (95% CI)BetaOR (95% CI)
Subjective sensory changes0.982.66 (1.20, 5.90)NSNS
Below knee pain1.836.25 (2.80, 13.94)0.762.13 (1.19, 3.83)
Leg pain worse than back pain1.524.55 (1.89, 10.99)1.082.94 (1.77, 4.89)
Leg pain intensityNSNS0.141.15 (1.03, 1.29)
Positive cough / sneezeNSNS0.922.50 (1.34, 4.65)
Neural Tension tests3.0721.63 (9.00,51.97)0.561.76 (1.03, 3.00)
Neurological deficit2.148.50 (3.80,19.01)1.042.81 (1.69, 4.69)
Intercept-3.25-2.98
AUC0.95 (0.93, 0.98)0.82 (0.78, 0.86)
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratios; CI, confidence intervals; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; NS, non-significant at p≤ 0.05

Model (i): Confidence ≥80% sciatica clinical diagnosis

Model (ii): Confidence ≥80% sciatica clinical diagnosis plus confirmatory magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings

The predicted probability of sciatica can be calculated using the following formulae

Model (i): Probability (sciatica+) = 1/ 1+exp -[-3.25 + (subjective sensory changes x 0.98) + (below knee pain x 1.83) + (leg pain worse than back pain x 1.52) + (neural tension x 3.07) + (neurological deficit x 2.14)].

Model (ii): Probability (sciatica+) = 1/ 1+exp -[-2.98 + (below knee pain x0.76) + (leg pain worse than back pain x 1.08) + (intensity leg pain x 0.14) + (positive cough/sneeze x 0.92) + (neural tension x 0.56) + (neurological deficit x 1.04)]