AMI MODEL WORKING IN FLORIDA: FUNCTIONAL IMPROVEMENTS, REDUCED UTILIZATION COSTS BY MEDICAID PATIENTS
 
   

AMI Model Working in Florida: Functional Improvements,
Reduced Utilization Costs by Medicaid Patients

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:
    Frankp@chiro.org
 
   

FROM:   Dynamic Chiropractic ~ April 22, 2008


Background:   Alternative Medicine Integration (AMI) originally achieved recognition within the chiropractic community for its unique HMO model that utilized doctors of chiropractic as primary-care physicians (PCPs) and the portal of entry into an integrated health care delivery system, inclusive of hospitals, MDs and MD specialists and outpatient facilities.

Contracted with Blue Cross Blue Shield's HMO-Illinois, AMI's integrated IPA demonstrated excellent clinical and cost outcomes.

These outcomes were published in the June 2007 issue of JMPT and reviewed in the June 4, 2007 issue of DC. [1] In July 2007, AMI received the national endorsement of the Congress of Chiropractic State Associations (COCSA) for its outcomes-based model of chiropractic medical management.

AMI also has been documenting the clinical and cost outcomes of its holistic, patient-centered disease management program for chronic pain patients enrolled in the Florida Medicaid system. While pharmaceutically oriented disease-management programs for diabetes, hypertension, COPD and heart disease have become staples of compliance-driven, cost-containment measures offered by insurance companies and managed-care organizations, largely unnoticed by media and consumers is the growth of costs associated with chronic pain, which has become the number-one cost driver for Medicaid and the commercial populations. Coupled with the national health care trend of increased pharmaceutical usage and its associated issues of prescription drug complications, contraindications, addiction to painkillers and accidental death inherent and measurable within the conventional medical model, treatment costs for chronic pain-related diagnoses continue to escalate.

AMI's initial three-year findings suggest integrating complementary and alternative medicine with conventional care management approaches in the Florida Medicaid system reduces the cost of care for the payer and improves the quality of life for the patient. All indications point to the conclusion that an integrative approach to treating the "whole" person is effective in this patient population.

To chiropractors and other practitioners of natural medicine, this is not a surprise. Chances are you have anecdotal stories of patient improvement within this vulnerable and challenging population. However, what is noteworthy is that since April 2004, AMI has successfully worked with the state of Florida to provide services to those beneficiaries who have been diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome, chronic back pain, chronic neck pain and/or fibromyalgia. AMI's holistic nurse case managers integrate the conventional medical care these beneficiaries receive with CAM services from providers including chiropractors, acupuncturists, massage therapists, nutritionists, pharmacists and registered nurse care managers.

Case managers refer appropriate patients to local chiropractors, much the same way they refer appropriate patients to local massage therapists or acupuncturists. In all cases, the case managers then coordinate information regarding the CAM therapies received back to the PCP. Enrolled beneficiaries also receive appropriate educational materials provided at the point of service, patient outreach phone calls, home visits, and access to community support groups.

Methods:   Independent evaluators from the University of South Florida analyzed Medicaid claims data with dates of service from July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005. Paid claims were analyzed for two distinct groups: an "eligible but not managed group" and an "eligible and managed group." The former was comprised of 494 beneficiaries (11,446 case months) who received no CAM services during the study time frame. The latter group was comprised 185 beneficiaries (4,284 case months) who received CAM services during the same time frame.

Findings:   Clinical improvement was measured utilizing the SF-12 to quantify changes in both mental and physical functioning. Compared to baseline, patients in the "eligible and managed group" averaged 20 percent improvement in both the physical and mental categories over a three-year period. This is noteworthy when compared with conventional pharmaceutically-oriented disease management programs, which rarely see improvements beyond 5 percent in either category. Ninety percent of the beneficiaries reported that "program treatment providers helped to reduce my levels of pain."

Given these improved clinical markers, it is not surprising that reductions in cost also were achieved within the managed group. Compared to baseline, Florida Medicaid beneficiaries managed by AMI realized an actual reduction of per-member per-month (PMPM) costs of more than 9 percent, while the comparable non-managed group realized an increase of PMPM cost of 15 percent over the same time frame. A baseline analysis was performed prior to the implementation of the program on paid claims data by chronic pain diagnosis for 6,556 eligible Florida Medicaid beneficiaries spanning the time frame of July 1, 2000 through Dec. 31, 2002. Results of this analysis support this escalating trend of expenses in the non-managed group, demonstrating that the Florida Medicaid population in general had a 12 percent increase in total health care costs during this time frame.

Since chronic pain patients had higher than average total costs and increased levels of service utilization as compared to the Florida Medicaid population in general, the trend of 15 percent increased costs is thought to be consistent with other data points. It also is important to note that given the observed escalating cost trends of 15 percent in the non-managed group," the cost savings of the managed group still resulted in a net reduction of 12 percent, inclusive of AMI program costs. On a PMPM basis, the net cost savings totaled $115 PMPM for patients in the managed group.

The state of Florida has acknowledged the value of AMI's chronic pain program and is diligently working on expanding the program to enable additional beneficiaries to benefit from these services. AMI would like to acknowledge the leadership and support of Senator Dennis Jones, DC, and former representative Frank Farkas, DC, as well as the vision of Adrian Langford III in making this program available to much-needed recipients.



References:

  1. Chiropractors as Primary Care Providers
    Dynamic Chiropractic, June 4, 2007



Return to the INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE Page

Return to the CHIROPRACTIC AND PAIN MANAGEMENT Page

Since 5-11-2017

         © 19952017 ~ The Chiropractic Resource Organization ~ All Rights Reserved