Mechanical Low-Back Pain: A Comparison of Medical and Chiropractic Management Within the Victorian WorkCare Scheme

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:   Frankp@chiro.org

FROM:   Chiropractic Journal of Australia 1992 (Jun);   22 (2):   47–53

Ebrall, Phillip

A retrospective study was made of all work-related mechanical low-back (MLBP) claimants within a twelve-month period in Victoria, Australia. Two matched samples were identified where management was solely by either a chiropractor or a medical practitioner. Comparisons of costs and outcomes were made between the two samples with the results being:

(i)   a significantly lower number of claimants requiring compensation days when chiropractic management was chosen,

(ii)   fewer compensation days taken by claimants who received chiropractic management,

(iii)   a greater number of patients progressed to chronic status when medical management was chosen, and

(iv)   a greater average payment per claim with medical management.

A further result, namely, a higher average practitioner payment with chiropractic management, suggests a more intense level of practitioner/patient interaction by chiropractors. These results demonstrate a significant benefit to the community by chiropractic participation within the Victorian compensation scheme for work-related low-back pain.

Return to the COST-EFFECTIVENESS Section

Since 6-26-2003