Manual Therapies for Primary Chronic Headaches:
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:

FROM:   J Headache Pain. 2014 (Oct 2);   15:   67 ~ FULL TEXT

Aleksander Chaibi and Michael Bjørn Russell

Head and Neck Research Group,
Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital,
1478 Lørenskog, Oslo, Norway.

This is to our knowledge the first systematic review regarding the efficacy of manual therapy randomized clinical trials (RCT) for primary chronic headaches. A comprehensive English literature search on CINHAL, Cochrane, Medline, Ovid and PubMed identified 6 RCTs all investigating chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). One study applied massage therapy and five studies applied physiotherapy. Four studies were considered to be of good methodological quality by the PEDro scale. All studies were pragmatic or used no treatment as a control group, and only two studies avoided co-intervention, which may lead to possible bias and makes interpretation of the results more difficult. The RCTs suggest that massage and physiotherapy are effective treatment options in the management of CTTH. One of the RCTs showed that physiotherapy reduced headache frequency and intensity statistical significant better than usual care by the general practitioner. The efficacy of physiotherapy at post-treatment and at 6 months follow-up equals the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants. Effect size of physiotherapy was up to 0.62. Future manual therapy RCTs are requested addressing the efficacy in chronic migraine with and without medication overuse. Future RCTs on headache should adhere to the International Headache Society's guidelines for clinical trials, i.e., frequency as primary end-point, while duration and intensity should be secondary end-point, avoid co-intervention, includes sufficient sample size and follow-up period for at least 6 months.

KEYWORDS:   Randomized clinical trials, Primary chronic headache, Manual therapies, Massage, Physiotherapy, Chiropractic

From the FULL TEXT Article:


Primary chronic headaches i.e. chronic migraine (CM), chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) and chronic cluster headache has significant health, economic and social costs. About 3% of the general population suffers from chronic headache with female predominance [1]. The International Classification of Headache Disorders III β (ICDH–III β) defines CM as ≥15 headache days/month for at least 3 months with features of migraine in ≥8 days/month, CTTH is defined as on average ≥15 days/month with tension-type headache for at least 3 months, and chronic cluster headache as attacks at least every other day for more than 1 year without remission, or with remissions lasting <1 month [2].

About 80% consult their primary physician for primary chronic headache [3], and pharmacological management is considered first line of treatment. However, the risk is that it may cause overuse of acute headache medication due to frequent headache attacks. 47% of those with primary chronic headache in the general Norwegian population overused acute headache medication [1, 4]. Considering the high use of acute medication, both prophylactic medication and non-pharmacological management should therefore be considered in the management [5, 6]. Prophylactic medication is used only by 3% in the general Norwegian population, while 52% have tried physiotherapy and 28% have tried chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy [3]. Non-pharmacological management has furthermore the advantage of few and usually minor transient adverse events and no pharmacological interaction/adverse event [7].

Previous systematic reviews have focused on RCTs for tension-type headache, migraine and/or cervicogenic headache, but not on efficacy on primary chronic headache [5, 6, 8–11]. Manual therapy is a physical treatment used by physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths and other practitioners to treat musculoskeletal pain and disability, and includes massage therapy, joint mobilization and manipulation [12].

This is to our knowledge the first systematic review assessing the efficacy of manual therapy randomized controlled trials (RCT) for primary chronic headache using headache frequency as primary end-point and headache duration and intensity as secondary end-points.


The English literature search was done on CINHAL, Cochrane, Medline, Ovid and PubMed. Search words were; migraine, chronic migraine, tension-type headache, chronic tension-type headache, cluster headache, chronic cluster headache combined with the words; massage therapy, physiotherapy, spinal mobilization, manipulative therapy, spinal manipulative therapy, osteopathic treatment or chiropractic. We identified studies by a comprehensive computerized search. Relevant reviews were screened for additional relevant RCTs. The selection of articles was performed by the authors. All RCTs written in English using either of the manual therapies for CM, CTTH and/or chronic cluster headache were evaluated. Studies including combined headache types without specific results for CM, CTTH and/or chronic cluster headache were excluded. The review included manual therapy RCTs presenting at least one of the following efficacy parameters; headache frequency, duration and pain intensity for CM, CTTH and/or chronic cluster headache as recommended by the International Headache Society’s clinical trial guidelines [13, 14]. Headache frequency is a primary end-point, while duration and pain intensity are secondary end-points. Headache diagnoses were preferentially classified according to the criteria of ICHD–III β or previous editions [2, 15–17]. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was evaluated using the PEDro scale, Table 1 [18]. A RCT was considered to be of high quality if the PEDro score was ≥6 of a maximum score of 10. The methodological quality of the RCTs was assessed by AC. The PRISMA 2009 checklist was applied for this systematic review. Effect size was calculated when possible. Effect size of 0.2 was regarded as small, 0.5 as medium and 0.8 as large [19].

This systematic review was executed directly based on the ascertained RCTs available and has not been registered as a review protocol.


The literature search identified six RCTs that met our inclusion criteria. One study applied massage therapy (MT) and five studies applied physiotherapy (PT) [20–25]. All studies assessed CTTH, while no studies assessed CM or chronic cluster headache.

      Methodological quality

Table 2 shows that the methodological PEDro score of the included RCTs ranged from 1 to 8 points. Four RCTs were considered of good methodological quality, while two RCTs had lower scores.

      Randomized controlled trials (RCT)

Table 3 shows the study population, intervention and efficacy of the six RCTs.

Table 1.   PEDro score
“yes” or “no” items

Table 2.   The methodological
PEDro score of the included
randomized controlled
trials (RCTs)

Table 3.   Results of manual
therapy randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of chronic
tension-type headache (CTTH)

Massage therapy   A Spanish physiotherapist conducted a 2-armed prospective crossover RCT with pairwise comparisons and blinded outcome measures [20]. The study included participants with CTTH diagnosed by a neurologist. The ICHD–II criteria for CTTH were slightly modified, i.e. pain intensity was defined as ≤5 on a 0–10 numeric pain rating scale, and the accompanying symptoms photophobia, phonophobia or mild nausea was not allowed [16]. Primary and secondary end-points were not specified. Results are shown in Table 3.

Editorial Comment

I find it odd that a 2014 paper which purports to compare manual therapy to “usual (medical) care” (which the author states includes “spinal mobilization, manipulative therapy, spinal manipulative therapy, osteopathic treatment or chiropractic”) failed to include the following landmark studies.   They were the basis for the conclusions drawn by the Cochrane Database, as reviewed in the author's own 5th citation.

The Efficacy of Spinal Manipulation, Amitriptyline and the Combination of
Both Therapies for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache

J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998 (Oct); 21 (8): 511–519
(Reviewed by the Cochrane Database, and was discussed in his 5th citation)

Spinal Manipulation vs. Amitriptyline for the Treatment of Chronic
Tension-type Headaches: A Randomized Clinical Trial

J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1995 (Mar); 18 (3): 148–154
(Reviewed by the Cochrane Database, and was discussed in his 5th citation)

Physiotherapy   An American 3–armed retrospectively RCT had unblinded outcome measures [21]. The diagnostic criteria were ≥25 headache days/month for >6 months without associated symptoms nausea, vomiting, photo- and phonophobia, but with tender muscles, i.e. CTTH with pericranial tenderness. Participants with cervicogenic headache or neurological findings were excluded. Primary and secondary end-points were not pre-specified, but headache index, defined here as headache frequency × severity, was the evaluated end-point.

A Turkish study conducted a 2–armed prospective RCT with unblinded outcome measures [22]. The participants were diagnosed with CTTH according to ICHD–I [15]. Participants with mixed headache, neurological and systemic aliment, or participants whom had received physiotherapy within 6 months prior to the study were excluded. Primary end-points was headache index defined as frequency × severity.

A Danish study conducted a 2–armed prospective RCT with blinded outcome measures [23]. Participants were diagnosed CTTH by a neurologist according to the criteria of ICHD–I [15]. Participants with other primary headaches, neuralgia, neurological, systemic or psychiatric disorders or medication overuse defined as >100 analgesic tablets or >2 doses of triptans and ergotamine per month were excluded. The primary end-point was headache frequency, and the secondary end-points were headache duration and intensity. The results shown in Table 3 were not influenced by pericranial muscles tenderness.

A Dutch study conducted a 2–armed prospective, multicentre RCT with blinded outcome measures [24]. Participants were diagnosed with CTTH by a physician according to ICHD–I [15]. Participants with multiple headache types or those whom had received physiotherapy within the last 6 months were excluded. Primary end-points were headache frequency while duration and intensity were secondary end-points.

The 2nd Dutch study conducted a 2–armed prospective pragmatic, multicentre RCT with self-reported primary and secondary end-points, i.e. headache frequency, duration and intensity [25]. Participants were diagnosed by a physician according to the criteria of ICHD–II [16]. Participants with rheumatoid arthritis, suspected malignancy, pregnancy, non-Dutch speaking, those whom had received physiotherapy within the last 2 months, triptan, ergotamine or opiods users were excluded.


The current systematic review evaluating the efficacy of manual therapy in RCTs for primary chronic headaches only identified RCTs treating CTTH. Thus, the efficacy of CM and chronic cluster headache could not be evaluated in this review.

      Methodological considerations

The methodological quality of studies assessing manual therapies for headache disorders are frequently being criticised for being too low. Occasionally rightly so, but often do the methodological design prevent manual therapy studies from reaching what is considered gold standard in pharmacological RCTs. For instance, a placebo treatment is difficult to establish while the investigator cannot be blinded for its applied intervention. The average score of the included studies was 5.8 (SD 2.6) points and four studies were considered of good quality. All RCTs failed to include sample size ≥50 in the smallest group. Sufficient sample size with power calculation prior is important to confine type 2 errors. Three studies did not state primary and secondary end-points, which confound effect-size calculation, and risk of type 2 errors inferred from multiple measures [20–22]. Conducting a manual therapy RCT is both time and cost consuming, while blinding often is difficult as there is no single validated standardized sham-treatment which can be used as a control group to this date. Thus, all of the included studies were pragmatic or used no treatment as a control group.

Apart from the participants in the retrospective study [21], all participants were diagnosed by a physician or neurologist. A diagnostic interview is the gold standard, while questionnaire and lay interviews are less precise diagnostic tools regarding headache disorders [26].

Co-intervention was only avoided in two studies [22, 20]. Two studies performed intention-to-treat analysis which is recommended to protect against odd outcome values and preserve baseline comparability [24, 25, 27].


The massage therapy study included only 11 participants, but the massage group had significantly more reduction in their headache intensity than detuned ultrasound group [20].

54%, 82% and 85% of the participants in three of the physiotherapy RCTs had a ≥50% reduction in headache frequency post-treatment [23–25], and the effect was maintained in the two studies that had a 6 months follow-up [24, 25]. This is comparable with the 40–70% of participants whom have a similar effect using tricyclic antidepressants [28, 29]. The effect of tricyclic also seems to improve over time, i.e. after more than 6 months treatment [29]. However, tricyclic antidepressants have a series of side effects in contrast to physiotherapy, while manual therapy requires more consultations. Two studies assessed headache index defined as headache frequency × intensity [21, 22]. Both studies showed a significant improvement post-treatment and at 1 month and 6 months follow-up respectively.

Four of the studies reported 10.1 mean years with headache, thus, the effect observed is likely to be due to the therapeutic effect rather than spontaneous improvement or regression to the mean [21–23, 25].

Acute headache medication is frequently used for primary headaches, and if the headache frequency increases, there is an increased risk for medication overuse headache. Increased use of prophylactic medication has thus been suggested in the management for primary chronic headaches [3]. Since manual therapies seems to have a beneficial effect that equals the effect of prophylactic medication [28, 29], without the pharmacological side effects, manual therapies should be considered on an equal level as pharmacological management strategies.

Effect size could be calculated in three of the six RCTs. Effect size on headache frequency was up to 0.62, while it was less regarding duration and intensity, while headache index (frequency × intensity) was up to 0.37 (Table 3). Thus, a small to moderate effect size might however, be substantial to the individual, especially considering that nearly daily headache i.e. mean 12/14 days reduced to mean 3/14 days [25], which equals ≥75% reduction in headache frequency. Usually a ≥50% reduction is traditionally used in pain trails, but considering the fact that CTTH is difficult to treat, some investigators operate with ≥30% improvement of primary efficacy parameter compared with placebo [30].


The present study might have possible biases. One of them being publication bias as the authors made no attempt to identify unpublished RCTs. Although we did perform a comprehensive search, we acknowledge it is possible to miss a single or few RCT, especially non-English RCT.


Manual therapy has an efficacy in the management of CTTH that equals prophylactic medication with tricyclic antidepressant. At present no manual therapy studies exist for chronic migraine or chronic cluster headache. Future manual therapy RCTs on primary chronic headache should adhere to the recommendation of the International Headache Society, i.e. primary end point is headache frequency and secondary end-points are duration and intensity. Future manual therapy studies on CM with and without medication overuse is also warranted, since such studies do not exist today.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AC prepared the initial draft and performed the methodological assessment of the included studies. MBR had the original idea of the study, planned the overall design and revised the drafted manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.


Akershus University Hospital, Norway, kindly provided research facilities.


The study received funding from Extrastiftelsen, the Norwegian Chiropractic Association in Norway and University of Oslo.


  1. Grande RB, Aaseth K, Gulbrandsen P, Lundqvist C, Russell MB.
    Prevalence of primary chronic headache in a population-based sample of 30- to 44-year-old persons: the Akershus study of chronic headache.
    Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30(2):76–83

  2. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society.
    The International Classification of Headache Disorders,
    3rd edition (beta version)
    Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629–808

  3. Kristoffersen ES, Grande RB, Aaseth K, Lundqvist C, Russell MB.
    Management of primary chronic headache in the general population: the Akershus study of chronic headache.
    J Headache Pain. 2012;13(2):113–120

  4. Aaseth K, Grande RB, Kvaerner KJ, Gulbrandsen P, Lundqvist C, Russell MB.
    Prevalence of secondary chronic headaches in a population-based sample of 30-44-year-old persons: the Akershus study of chronic headache.
    Cephalalgia. 2008;28(7):705–713

  5. Bronfort G, Nilsson N, Haas M, Evans R, Goldsmith CH, Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM.
    Non-invasive physical treatments for chronic/recurrent headache.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;3:1–69

  6. Chaibi A, Tuchin PJ, Russell MB.
    Manual therapies for migraine: a systematic review.
    J Headache Pain. 2011;12(2):127–133

  7. Carnes D, Mars TS, Mullinger B, Froud R, Underwood M.
    Adverse events and manual therapy: a systematic review.
    Man Ther. 2010;15(4):355–363

  8. Lenssinck ML, Damen L, Verhagen AP, Berger MY, Passchier J, Koes BW.
    The effectiveness of physiotherapy and manipulation in patients with tension-type headache: a systematic review.
    Pain. 2004;112(3):381–388

  9. Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Cuadrado ML, Miangolarra JC, Barriga FJ, Pareja JA.
    Are manual therapies effective in reducing pain from tension-type headache: a systematic review.
    Clin J Pain. 2006;22(3):278–285

  10. Chaibi A, Russell MB.
    Manual therapies for cervicogenic headache: a systematic review.
    J Headache Pain. 2012;13(5):351–359

  11. Posadzki P, Ernst E.
    Spinal manipulations for tension-type headaches: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Complement Ther Med. 2012;20(4):232–239

  12. French HP, Brennan A, White B, Cusack T.
    Manual therapy for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee - a systematic review.
    Man Ther. 2011;16(2):109–117

  13. Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlof C, Diener HC, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Guidetti V, Jones B, Lipton RB, Massiou H, Meinert C, Sandrini G, Steiner T, Winter PB.
    International Headache Society Clinical Trial Subcommittee. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition.
    Cephalalgia. 2000;20(9):765–786

  14. Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J, Wang SJ.
    Task Force of the International Headache Society Clinical Trial Subcommittee. Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults.
    Cephalalgia. 2008;28(5):484–495

  15. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society.
    Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain: Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society.
    Cephalalgia. 1988;8(suppl 7):1–96

  16. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Society.
    The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition.
    Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl 1):9–160

  17. Olesen J, Bousser MG, Diener HC, Dodick D, First M, Goadsby PJ, Gobel H, Lainez MJ, Lance JW, Lipton RB, Nappi G, Sakai F, Schoenen J, Silberstein SD, Steiner TJ.
    International Headache Society New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine.
    Cephalalgia. 2006;26(6):742–746

  18. Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, Maher CG.
    Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)
    Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(1):43–49

  19. Cohen J.
    Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2.
    Routledge, USA; 1988.

  20. Toro-Velasco C, Arroyo-Morales M, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Barrero-Hernandez FJ.
    Short-term effects of manual therapy on heart rate variability, mood state, and pressure pain sensitivity in patients with chronic tension-type headache: a pilot study.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(7):527–535

  21. Jay GW, Brunson J, Branson SJ.
    The effectiveness of physical therapy in the treatment of chronic daily headaches.
    Headache. 1989;29(3):156–162

  22. Demirturk F, Akarcali I, Akbayrak T, Citak I, Inan L.
    Results of two different manual therapy techniques in chronic tension-type headache.
    Pain Clin. 2002;14(2):121–128

  23. Torelli P, Jensen R, Olesen J.
    Physiotherapy for tension-type headache: a controlled study.
    Cephalalgia. 2004;24(1):29–36

  24. Ettekoven VH, Lucas C.
    Efficacy of physiotherapy including a craniocervical training programme for tension-type headache; a randomized clinical trial.
    Cephalalgia. 2006;26(8):983–991

  25. Castien RF, Van der Windt DA, Grooten A, Dekker J.
    Effectiveness of manual therapy for chronic tension-type headache: a pragmatic, randomised, clinical trial.
    Cephalalgia. 2011;31(2):133–143

  26. Rasmussen BK, Jensen R, Olesen J.
    Questionnaire versus clinical interview in the diagnosis of headache.
    Headache. 1991;31(5):290–295

  27. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG.
    CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
    BMJ. 2010;340:c869

  28. Bendtsen L, Jensen R, Olesen J.
    A non-selective (amitriptyline), but not a selective (citalopram), serotonin reuptake inhibitor is effective in the prophylactic treatment of chronic tension-type headache.
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;61(3):285–290

  29. Jackson JL, Shimeall W, Sessums L, Dezee KJ, Becher D, Diemer M, Berbano E, O'Malley PG.
    Tricyclic antidepressants and headaches: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ. 2010;341:c5222

  30. Bendtsen L, Bigal ME, Cerbo R, Diener HC, Holroyd K, Lampl C, Mitsikostas DD, Steiner TJ, Tfelt-Hansen P.
    Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in tension-type headache: second edition.
    Cephalalgia. 2010;30(1):1–16

Return to the HEADACHE Page

Since 5–24–2017

         © 1995–2017 ~ The Chiropractic Resource Organization ~ All Rights Reserved