RECOGNIZING THE VALUE OF CHIROPRACTIC FOR CHRONIC PAIN
 
   

Recognizing the Value of Chiropractic for Chronic Pain

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:
   Frankp@chiro.org
 
   

FROM:   Dynamic Chiropractic 2008 (Sep 23);   26 (20):   1 ~ FULL TEXT

Tina Beychok, Associate Editor


Unlike previous editions, the latest ACOEM occupational medicine guidelines actually recommend spinal manipulation.

Pain is the most prevalent health condition among U.S. workers and the most expensive in terms of lost productivity.

Recent studies suggest more than six in 10 adults over the age of 30 experience chronic pain. Furthermore, health care expenditures for back and neck pain have risen to more than $80 billion a year in the U.S. – a dramatic increase over the past eight years, without evidence of improved health. In addition to the costs of lost productivity, an estimated $64 billion per year is lost due to workers continuing to work, even though pain reduces their job performance. This phenomenon is called "presenteeism."

Unfortunately, workers' comp can be a quagmire of contradictory and insufficient rules and regulations as to what treatments are and aren't covered. The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) has been in the process of revising its Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines, which have not always taken a positive view of chiropractic manipulation. In fact, the second edition of the guidelines, released in 2005, was heavily criticized by some in the chiropractic community. [1]

ACOEM's latest chronic pain guidelines (a chapter of the overall guidelines) may represent a step in the right direction in terms of recognizing the value of chiropractic care. The guidelines actually recommend manipulation for chronic, persistent low back or neck pain and cervicogenic headache. [2] This is significant because in the past, the guidelines failed to recommend manipulation, even when other treatment strategies (medication, etc.) were rated as less effective.

At best, manipulation was listed as an “option” for certain conditions. It should be noted that the revised chronic pain guidelines do not recommend manipulation for neuropathic pain, chronic regional pain syndrome, areas other than the neck or back, or for regular/routine use.

The evidence-based guidelines include more than 200 recommendations for chronic pain, developed by a multidisciplinary panel and reviewed by leading medical and health organizations. The recommendations focus on treatments for several chronic pain conditions including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), neuropathic pain, trigger points/myofascial pain, chronic persistent pain, fibromyalgia and chronic low back pain. The recommendations are based on more than 1,500 references, including 546 randomized, controlled trials.


Guidelines of interest to the chiropractic profession include the following:


Recommendation:
Manipulation or Mobilization for Chronic Persistent Low Back or Neck Pain


  • A brief course of mobilization or manipulation is moderately recommended for treatment of chronic, persistent low back or neck pain.

  • Frequency/Duration –   In patients with good functional outcomes that include return to work following manipulation, 1 to 2 manipulations every 3 to 6 months to maintain at-work status, provided there is adherence to a conditioning program consisting of aerobic and strengthening exercises. Manipulation and mobilization should be combined with aerobic and strengthening exercise and education to avoid dependence. Number of treatments should be dependent on the response. Functional improvement (not just minor improvements in pain rating) and program progression should be documented when reevaluated after 6 visits. Substantial additional functional response (e.g., return to work or ADL, ability to tolerate exercise, reduced medication use) should be documented at each subsequent reevaluation within 3 to 6 visit intervals.

  • Indications for Discontinuation –   Lack of demonstrated continued functional response should result in either a change to an alternative manipulation or mobilization program (e.g., switching from a low- to a high-force procedure) or discontinuation of the intervention.

Strength of Evidence–   Recommended


Recommendation:
Manipulation for Cervicogenic Headaches


  • Manipulation is recommended for treatment of cervicogenic headaches.

  • Frequency/Duration –   A trial of 3 to 6 cervical manipulation appointments. Objective improvements should be documented prior to consideration of additional treatments. It should also be coupled with other elements of a functional restoration program.

Strength of Evidence–   Recommended


Recommendation:
Manipulation or Mobilization for Recurrent Exacerbations of Chronic, Persistent Pain (Low Back and/or Neck Pain)

  • A brief course of mobilization or manipulation is recommended for treatment of recurrent exacerbations of low back or neck pain. Patients with good functional outcomes (return to work or reduced medication use) following manipulation during exacerbations may benefit from repeated use of manipulation during subsequent exacerbations. In this setting, the exacerbation of low back or neck pain can be considered as an acute episode and treated accordingly. A mild or moderate exacerbation may require only a few treatment encounters. Manipulation for frequent or regular episodes may suggest treatment ineffectiveness and thus intervention needs to be abandoned in favor of other care approaches that are less intensive or yield more enduring outcomes.

Strength of Evidence–   Recommended


Editor-in-Chief Kurt T. Hegmann, MD, MPH, stated:

“These guidelines were developed using ACOEM's published methodology, which incorporates the highest scientific standards for reviewing evidence-based literature, ensuring the most rigorous, reproducible, and transparent occupational health guidelines available. Literally thousands of hours of review of the available scientific literature went into this process, yielding what we consider state-of-the-art medical guidelines.”


References

1.   Lewkovich G, Haneline M, Mumbauer E, Sackett M.
The ACOEM Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines: Biased Against Chiropractic Care
Dynamic Chiropractic, Jan. 1, 2005

2.   Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines: Evaluation and Management of Common Health Problems and Functional Recovery in Workers, 2nd Edition, 2008 revision.
www.acoem.org/practiceguidelines.aspx



Return to the PAIN Page

Return to the REHABILITATION DIPLOMATE Page

Return to the CHIROPRACTIC AND CHRONIC NECK PAIN Page

Since 9-25-2008

             © 1995—2014    The Chiropractic Resource Organization    All Rights Reserved