Chromium Nicotinate vs. Chromium Picolinate
 
   

Chromium Nicotinate vs. Chromium Picolinate

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:   Frankp@chiro.org
 
   

NOTE: This post is from a specific and highly respected manufacturer of supplements, so I can not name the author at this time. When the information they mention is published, and the abstract is available, I will list it on this page.

Chromium is an essential trace mineral that helps the hormone insulin to function at its full potential. Nicotinate and picolinate are two forms of chromium. Proponents of the picolinate form claim that it lowers cholesterol, burns body fat, and increases life span.

In order to evaluate scientific merit of chromium picolinate, we collaborated on a study with researchers at the University of Texas at Austin. Despite claims of fat burning and weight loss, it yielded none of these effects in overweight women. Additionally, in a direct comparison against chromium nicotinate, the picolinate source was less effective in supporting the action of insulin.

Additionally, there is some scientific evidence suggesting that chromium picolinate triggers chromosomal changes that could be a factor in carcinogenesis. While it is our conclusion that much more research would be needed to indict chromium picolinate as harmful, its scientific track record of efficacy is poor. Hence, the nicotinate form is the preferrable medium to provide added chromium to the diet.


[SWIRL 2]


Return to the CHROMIUM Section


Return to the NUTRITION ARCHIVES Section


           © 1995—2010    The Chiropractic Resource Organization    All Rights Reserved