PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR RECURRENCES IN NECK PAIN PATIENTS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER CHIROPRACTIC CARE
 
   

Prognostic Factors for Recurrences in Neck Pain Patients
Up to 1 Year After Chiropractic Care

This section was compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:
  Frankp@chiro.org
 
   

FROM:   J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 (Sep);   38 (7):   458–464 ~ FULL TEXT

Anke Langenfeld, MS, B. Kim Humphreys, DC, PhD,
Jaap Swanenburg, PhD, Cynthia K. Peterson, RN, DC, MMedEd, PhD

CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care,
Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University,
Maastricht, The Netherlands


OBJECTIVE:   Information about recurrence and prognostic factors is important for patients and practitioners to set realistic expectations about the chances of full recovery and to reduce patient anxiety and uncertainty. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess recurrence and prognostic factors for neck pain in a chiropractic patient population at 1 year from the start of the current episode.

METHODS:   Within a prospective cohort study, 642 neck pain patients were recruited by chiropractors in Switzerland. After a course of chiropractic therapy, patients were followed up for 1 year regarding recurrence of neck pain. A logistic regression analysis was used to assess prognostic factors for recurrent neck pain. The independent variables age, pain medication usage, sex, work status, duration of complaint, previous episodes of neck pain and trauma onset, numerical rating scale, and Bournemouth questionnaire for neck pain were analyzed. Prognostic factors that have been identified in previous studies to influence recovery of neck pain are psychologic distress, poor general health at baseline, and a previous history of pain elsewhere.

RESULTS:   Five hundred forty five patients (341 females), with a mean age of 42.1 years (SD, 13.1) completed the 1-year follow-up period. Fifty-four participants (11%) were identified as "recurrent." Prognostic factors associated with recurrent neck pain were previous episodes of neck pain and increasing age.

CONCLUSION:   The results of this study suggest that recurrence of neck pain within 1 year after chiropractic intervention in Swiss chiropractic patients presenting from varied onsets is low. This study found preliminary findings that older age and a previous episode of neck may be useful predictors of neck pain recurrence within 1 year.



Introduction

Neck pain is a common reason for patients seeking health care. [1] Most people will see a medical practitioner or another health care provider at least once in their lifetime due to neck pain. [2] Those who have experienced an episode of neck pain are likely to have another onset within the next 1 to 5 years. [3] Consequently, The Neck Pain Task Force has described neck pain as an episodic occurrence over one's lifetime with variable degrees of recovery between episodes. [2] Hush et al [4] reported that a new episode of neck pain appears to recover during the acute phase. Nevertheless, the prognosis for a complete recovery is quite poor. [4] In an observational study, it was shown that patients with a new episode of neck pain in primary care setting typically have high pain scores that improve rapidly during the 3 months after treatment. However, those who do not recover within the 3 months after the intervention have reported relatively low residual pain and disability. [5]

There are known prognostic factors for the onset of neck pain such as computer work, heavy physical work, psychosocial variables, psychologic variables (eg, catastrophizing and kinesiophobia), duration of complaint, age, sex, and previous neck injury. [6-11] Although several previous studies have made observations regarding neck pain (onset/recovery), no studies prospectively attempted to determine prognostic factors for recurrence of neck pain as a primary outcome.

Information about the possible development of the condition is crucial in shaping patients' expectations about recovery. [5] It is important that a neck pain patient knows what to expect after a chiropractic treatment and for the therapist to be able to distinguish those with neck pain who will recover and those who will not.

The first purpose of this study was to assess the number of episodes of self-reported recurrences over a 1-year period. The second purpose was to identify prognostic factors for the recurrence of neck pain after a chiropractic intervention.



Discussion

Information about recurrence and prognostic is important for patients and practitioners to set realistic expectations about the chances of a full recovery and to reduce patient anxiety and uncertainty.

      Recurrence of Neck Pain Complaint

The results of this study revealed that 89% of neck pain patients had recovered from their neck pain episode up to 1 year after receiving chiropractic care. Therefore, 11% of patients reported a new episode or recurrence of their neck pain or had the need for an additional neck pain intervention. Although an age of older than 45 years and a series of previous complaints were labeled as a significant prognostic factor during the statistical analyses, the Nagelkerke of 0.05 and the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.601 and 0.583 revealed that the model is overall a poor predictor of the individual's risk of recurrence.

Because of the fact that, in a literature search, no other study could be identified that focused on recurrence as a primary outcome, studies that worked with recovery and the clinical course of recovery are used to integrate our findings into recent research. In the study by Leaver et al [5] that focused the clinical course of a new episode of neck pain and on clinical factors that are associated with faster recovery rates, 22% of the participants included reported recurrences of their neck pain at 3 months. [5] There are differences in these 2 studies, which make it difficult to compare the outcomes. First of all, Leaver et al [5] focused not on recurrence as a primary outcome. They included patients with a new episode of neck pain of less than 3 months' duration that was preceded by at least 4 weeks without complaints. There was no clear definition of the problems being either acute or chronic, and they did not dichotomize the participants into acute or chronic. We chose to include participants with any duration of neck pain and subgrouped them. Another key point in our study was that participants did not have had any treatment in the previous 3 months by a chiropractor or physical therapist.

In the study of Leaver et al [5], the patients received either physical therapy or chiropractic at 4 treatment sessions over 2 weeks. During each session, patients received manual therapy that could have been a high-velocity thrust manipulation or mobilization. The selection of treatment methods was at the discretion of the treating therapist. In addition, they received exercises, advice about activity, and electrotherapy. In the current study, only chiropractic care was given that typically would include spinal manipulation, advice on the activities of daily living, trigger point therapy, therapeutic exercises, and mobilization techniques. [12] The type of intervention was not standardized, although normal and usual chiropractic care was applied, which in our opinion, reflects the reality of daily chiropractic practice.

      Prognostic Factors for Recurrence of Neck Pain

Age and a previous episode of neck pain were found to be prognostic factors for recurrence using logistic regression. However, we have to point out that also, these 2 variables were significant; however, further statistical analyses revealed that, overall, the model is a poor predictor. In particular, Croft et al [8] showed that previous episodes of neck pain are prognostic factors for recurrence of another neck pain episode, [8] and Leaver et al [5] and Croft et al [8] found that increasing age leads to a higher risk of recurrence.

Although it is tempting to explain the relationship based on increased spinal degeneration with increasing age, however, the research literature is equivocal on this issue. [23-26] More research is needed to understand the likely reasons for age as a predictor for recurrence of neck pain. On the other hand, factors such as injury [8, 27, 28] and female sex [6, 8, 11] could not be confirmed, although the literature shows that women are more likely to develop neck pain problems. [6, 8, 11, 29]

Furthermore, women have twice the prevalence and incidence for nonspecific neck pain compared with males. [30] However, this did not appear to influence the recurrence rate in the present study, although most of our participants were female (62.7%). Neck injury has also been connected with the onset of neck pain, [7, 8, 28] although our study could not find a relationship between a previous neck injury and recurrence of neck pain. One reason for this could be the small number of patients in our study with a previous neck injury (13.9%). Croft et al [8] used a different approach to investigate this issue using a longitudinal survey design. Participants were only included if they were free of any neck pain at the start and surveyed again after 1 year. [8] Of the total number of 1708 participants, 305 (17.8%) reported neck pain within the previous year, and 104 of these recalled a prior injury. [8] We cannot make a direct comparison, as our participants started with neck pain and were treated for this complaint.

An additional factor that is mentioned in the literature is duration of complaint. [31, 32] Rubinstein et al [31] used the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as this current study, but they were focused on identifying predictors of a favorable outcome, not prognostic factors for a recurrence. Rubinstein et al [31] state that subjects who have less than 30 days of neck pain are more likely to recover compared with patients with a duration of complaint more than 60 days. A previous study done by Peterson et al [14] focusing on the predictors of “improvement” revealed that acute patients have higher pain levels and disability before treatment but improve quicker than chronic patients. [14] That study worked with time points at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months and focused on “improvement” using the Patient's Global Impression of Change scale. [14]

Using the same patients from that database, this current study used a follow-up period of 12 months but focused only on whether the patients reported recurrences of their neck pain or were recovered. The results of this current study were not able to confirm that the duration of complaints before the first treatment influenced the onset of new episodes of neck pain. However, this could be caused by the duration of the follow-up; it might have been too short to include patients who had a recurrence more than 12 months after finishing the study. Kjellman et al [32] focused on prognostic factors for perceived pain and function, and they found that duration of the current complaint was a prognostic factor for neck pain recurrence at the 12-month follow-up time. [32] However, there are a number of differences compared with our study. In particular, Kjellman et al [32] compared different treatment settings. One hundred twenty-three participants were recruited at physiotherapy units to which they had been referred.

The second group of 70 patients was recruited during a randomized controlled trial that compared physiotherapy and chiropractic. [32] The patients participating in the randomized controlled trial did not have any treatment during the month before the start of the study. However, that rule was not applied to the patients recruited by the physiotherapy units. [32] In our opinion, that could have influenced the outcome, because 2 different study samples were used. Our study sample only included participants who had not undergone manual therapy treatment or chiropractic treatment previously and therefore make the outcome more generalizable. Consequently, caution should be used in comparing the study of Kjellmann et al [32] with the present one because of the different treatment and baseline settings.

It is clear that much more standardized research is needed in this area. Identifying the likelihood of recurrences in neck pain patients as well as prognostic factors for recurrence is important for patients and practitioners. The results of this study revealed that recurrence of another episode of neck pain within a year after the start of chiropractic care is low. However, having had a previous episode as well as increasing age is increased risk factors for predicting a subsequent new episode of neck pain within a year. This information may help patients understand and reduce their fear or anxiety related to their neck pain condition and help them recover by providing realistic information about their chance of a full recovery. [5, 29-35 ]


Limitations

There are limitations to the generalizability of our study. Ninety-seven patients (15%) withdrew from the study. We do not know if the dropout group was representative of the remaining participants. Of the remaining patients, 89% showed no recurrence, and this imbalanced group size could have influenced the logistic regression analysis. [33] Psychologic factors are also known to influence the recovery of pain patients. [3, 5, 8, 10] However, we did not analyze this for the current study. In addition, it would be reasonable to analyze the data with a more differentiated subgrouping, for example,

(1) chronic patients who did not seek additional care and

(2) chronic patients who did seek additional care.

Those patients may not necessarily be recurrent because they may have a persistent neck problem. Because of the limiting factors of the study, a confirmatory study is required.



Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that recurrence of neck pain within 1 year after chiropractic intervention in Swiss chiropractic patients presenting from varied onsets is low. It provides a better understanding of recurrent neck pain as well as prognostic risk factors for a subsequent episode of neck pain. Older age and a previous episode of neck may be useful predictors of neck pain recurrence within 1 year; however, additional studies are needed.



References:

  1. Global Year Against Musculoskeletal Pain.
    Int Assoc Study Pain. 2009;
    http://tinyurl.com/oy7de68

  2. Haldeman, S, Carroll, LJ, and Cassidy, JD.
    The empowerment of people with neck pain: introduction and its associated disorders.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33: 8–13

  3. Carroll, LJ, Hogg-johnson, S, Van Der, Velde G et al.
    Course and Prognostic Factors for Neck Pain in the General Population: Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 (Feb); 32 (2 Sup): S87–S96

  4. Hush, JM, Lin, CC, Michaleff, ZA et al.
    Prognosis of acute idiopathic neck pain is poor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 824–829

  5. Leaver, AM, Maher, CG, McAuley, JH, Jull, G, Latimer, J, and Refshauge, KM.
    People seeking treatment for a new episode of neck pain typically have rapid improvement in symptoms: an observational study.
    J Physiother. 2013; 59: 31–37

  6. Skillgate, E, Magnusson, C, Lundberg, M, and Hallqvist, J.
    The age- and sex-specific occurrence of bothersome neck pain in the general population—results from the Stockholm public health cohort.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13: 185

  7. Bohman, T, Côté, P, Boyle, E, Cassidy, JD, Carroll, LJ, and Skillgate, E.
    Prognosis of patients with whiplash-associated disorders consulting physiotherapy: development of a predictive model for recovery.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13: 264

  8. Croft, PR, Lewis, M, Papageorgiou, AC et al.
    Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population.
    Pain. 2001; 93: 317–325

  9. Feleus, A, Bierma-Zeinstra, SMA, Miedema, HS et al.
    Prognostic indicators for non-recovery of non-traumatic complaints at arm, neck and shoulder in general practice—6 months follow-up.
    Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007; 46: 169–176

  10. Karels, CH, Bierma-Zeinstra, SMA, Burdorf, A, Verhagen, AP, Nauta, AP, and Koes, BW.
    Social and psychological factors influenced the course of arm, neck and shoulder complaints.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 839–848

  11. Vos, CJ, Verhagen, AP, Passchier, J, and Koes, BW.
    Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute neck pain: an inception cohort study in general practice.
    Pain Med. 2008; 9: 572–580

  12. Humphreys BK, Peterson CK, Muehlemann D, Haueter P.
    Are Swiss Chiropractors Different Than Other Chiropractors?
    Results of the Job Analysis Survey 2009

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010 (Sep);   33 (7):   519–535

  13. Bryans, R, Decina, P, Descarreaux, M et al.
    Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Chiropractic Treatment of Adults With Neck Pain
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2014 (Jan); 37 (1): 42–63

  14. Peterson, C, Bolton, J, and Humphreys, BK.
    Predictors of Outcome in Neck Pain Patients Undergoing Chiropractic Care: Comparison of Acute and Chronic Patients
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 2012 (Aug 24); 20 (1): 27

  15. Bolton, JE and Humphreys, BK.
    The Bournemouth questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25: 141–148

  16. Soklic, M, Peterson, C, and Humphreys, BK.
    Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for neck pain.
    Chiropr Man Ther. 2012; 20: 2

  17. Childs, JD, Piva, SR, and Fritz, JM.
    Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30: 1331–1334

  18. Gay, RE, Madson, TJ, and Cieslak, KR.
    Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the neck Bournemouth questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007; 30: 259–262

  19. Longo, UG, Loppini, M, Denaro, L, Maffulli, N, and Denaro, V.
    Rating scales for low back pain.
    Br Med Bull. 2010; 94: 81–144

  20. Stanton, TR, Latimer, J, Maher, CG, and Hancock, MJ.
    A modified Delphi approach to standardize low back pain recurrence terminology.
    Eur Spine J. 2011; 20: 744–752

  21. Cook, NR.
    Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.
    Circulation. 2007; 115: 928–935

  22. Pepe, MS, Janes, H, Longton, G, Leisenring, W, and Newcomb, P.
    Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.
    Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159: 882–890

  23. Borghouts, JA, Koes, BW, and Bouter, LM.
    The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.
    Pain. 1998; 77: 1–13

  24. Hogg-Johnson, S, van der Velde, G, Carroll, LJ et al.
    The Burden and Determinants of Neck Pain in the General Population: Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 (Feb); 32 (2 Suppl): S46–S60

  25. Peterson, C, Bolton, J, Wood, AR, and Humphreys, BK.
    A cross-sectional study correlating degeneration of the cervical spine with disability and pain in United Kingdom patients.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28: 129–133

  26. Childs, JD, Cleland, JA, Elliott, JM et al.
    Neck pain: clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association.
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008; 38: A1–A34

  27. Paksaichol, A, Janwantanakul, P, Purepong, N, Pensri, P, and van der Beek, AJ.
    Office workers' risk factors for the development of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies.
    Occup Environ Med. 2012; 69: 610–618

  28. Hill, J, Lewis, M, Papageorgiou, AC, Dziedzic, K, and Croft, P.
    Predicting persistent neck pain: a 1-year follow-up of a population cohort.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29: 1648–1654

  29. Malchaire, J, Cock, N, and Vergracht, S.
    Review of the factors associated with musculoskeletal problems in epidemiological studies.
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001; 74: 79–90

  30. Cassou, B, Derriennic, F, Monfort, C et al.
    Chronic neck and shoulder pain, age, and working conditions: longitudinal results from a large random sample in France.
    Occup Environ Med. 2002; 59: 537–544

  31. Rubinstein, SM, Knol, DL, Leboeuf-Yde, C, de Koekkoek, TE, Pfeifle, CE, and van Tulder, MW.
    Predictors of a favorable outcome in patients treated by chiropractors for neck pain.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33: 1451–1458

  32. Kjellman, G, Skargren, E, and Oberg, B.
    Prognostic factors for perceived pain and function at one-year follow-up in primary care patients with neck pain.
    Disabil Rehabil. 2002; 24: 364–370

  33. Buitenhuis, J and de Jong, PJ.
    Fear avoidance and illness beliefs in post-traumatic neck pain.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36: S238–S243

  34. Meulders, A and Vlaeyen, JWS.
    Fear reduction in subacute whiplash-associated disorders: the royal road to recovery?.
    Pain. 2013; 154: 330–331

  35. Sterling, M.
    Does knowledge of predictors of recovery and nonrecovery assist outcomes after whiplash injury?.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36: S257–S262



Return to the CHIROPRACTIC AND CHRONIC NECK PAIN Page

Since 9-27-2015

         © 1995–2017 ~ The Chiropractic Resource Organization ~ All Rights Reserved