<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chiropractic Techniques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=6180</link>
	<description>Welcome to ChiroOrg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:23:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank M. Painter, D.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=6180&#038;cpage=1#comment-38693</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank M. Painter, D.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=6180#comment-38693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure what you mean by exclusive?  Do you mean the numbers of DCs that only use ONE technique, be it diversified or be it NUCCA?  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by exclusive?  Do you mean the numbers of DCs that only use ONE technique, be it diversified or be it NUCCA?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoenix chiropractor</title>
		<link>http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=6180&#038;cpage=1#comment-38691</link>
		<dc:creator>phoenix chiropractor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=6180#comment-38691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with another comment that the exclusive numbers would be interesting to know. Can you add that to the article as a follow up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with another comment that the exclusive numbers would be interesting to know. Can you add that to the article as a follow up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank M. Painter, D.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=6180&#038;cpage=1#comment-37529</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank M. Painter, D.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=6180#comment-37529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Andrew

The overlap of these percentages means that many of the interviewed DCs use more than one technique. The only truly &quot;exclusive&quot; techniques that I know of are the ones that focus strictly on upper cervical adjusting (UC) such as NUCCA, Blair, or Grostic. I have received referrals from UC doctors who needed support in other spinal regions, when UC care didn&#039;t resolve their patient&#039;s regional complaints.

I&#039;m a Palmer grad, and &quot;Palmer Package&quot; includes diversified, Palmer upper cervical, Gonstead, Thompson, and some Pierce pelvic as part of the package, and 20 other techniques were readily available as electives at a reasonable cost, like NUCCA, Pierce-Stillwagon, Logan Basic, Atlas Orthogonal etc.

I suspect each doctor starts with their favorite technique. The real issue is, if you are not getting dramatic results after a short trial of care (1-2 weeks), how quickly does that doctor switch to another approach? 

In reality, every new case is a unique puzzle, and no 2 are alike!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew</p>
<p>The overlap of these percentages means that many of the interviewed DCs use more than one technique. The only truly &#8220;exclusive&#8221; techniques that I know of are the ones that focus strictly on upper cervical adjusting (UC) such as NUCCA, Blair, or Grostic. I have received referrals from UC doctors who needed support in other spinal regions, when UC care didn&#8217;t resolve their patient&#8217;s regional complaints.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Palmer grad, and &#8220;Palmer Package&#8221; includes diversified, Palmer upper cervical, Gonstead, Thompson, and some Pierce pelvic as part of the package, and 20 other techniques were readily available as electives at a reasonable cost, like NUCCA, Pierce-Stillwagon, Logan Basic, Atlas Orthogonal etc.</p>
<p>I suspect each doctor starts with their favorite technique. The real issue is, if you are not getting dramatic results after a short trial of care (1-2 weeks), how quickly does that doctor switch to another approach? </p>
<p>In reality, every new case is a unique puzzle, and no 2 are alike!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew White</title>
		<link>http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=6180&#038;cpage=1#comment-37517</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=6180#comment-37517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When looking at this stats, I&#039;d be interested in knowing how many are exclusive.  I know its hard to get an answer like that on a poll.  But there can&#039;t truly be two 95% on techniques.  Can you run a poll asking about the more common or exclusivity of a technique?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When looking at this stats, I&#8217;d be interested in knowing how many are exclusive.  I know its hard to get an answer like that on a poll.  But there can&#8217;t truly be two 95% on techniques.  Can you run a poll asking about the more common or exclusivity of a technique?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
