<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of the CCE Cartel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=9939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=9939</link>
	<description>Welcome to ChiroOrg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:53:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Karapasas</title>
		<link>http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=9939&#038;cpage=1#comment-83724</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Karapasas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiro.org/wordpress/?p=9939#comment-83724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upon review by the U.S. Department of Education, the concerns regarding 34 CFR 602.13 (wide acceptance of its standards, policies, procedures, and decisions; and to address how its standards advance quality in chiropractic education) were dismissed.

In a letter from the USDE dated 3/15/12 to the CCE regarding re-accreditation, investigation revealed that a “small minority within the profession” were presenting themselves as a majority, which led to the enhanced review by NACIQI leading up to the re-accreditation hearing.

All of the other administrative points mentioned were listed and had to be corrected within 12 months of the date of the letter.

As was suspected by many… the accusations against the CCE are a tempest in a teapot. The same partisan battles over semantics and power struggles within the profession by one group to eliminate the other.

Language changes in the CCE document were, and are, supportive of ALL the mission statements of the colleges… without being partisan. As they should be…]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon review by the U.S. Department of Education, the concerns regarding 34 CFR 602.13 (wide acceptance of its standards, policies, procedures, and decisions; and to address how its standards advance quality in chiropractic education) were dismissed.</p>
<p>In a letter from the USDE dated 3/15/12 to the CCE regarding re-accreditation, investigation revealed that a “small minority within the profession” were presenting themselves as a majority, which led to the enhanced review by NACIQI leading up to the re-accreditation hearing.</p>
<p>All of the other administrative points mentioned were listed and had to be corrected within 12 months of the date of the letter.</p>
<p>As was suspected by many… the accusations against the CCE are a tempest in a teapot. The same partisan battles over semantics and power struggles within the profession by one group to eliminate the other.</p>
<p>Language changes in the CCE document were, and are, supportive of ALL the mission statements of the colleges… without being partisan. As they should be…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
