Table 1

Description of 14 studies published between 2008 and 2018, included in a systematic review on chiropractic Maintenance Care

Author Year of publicationDesign of studyPopulationSample sizeResponse rateResearch question explored
Axén 2008 [8]SurveyChiropractorsN = 5960%

Indications for Maintenance Care

Prevalence of Maintenance Care


Axén 2009 [10]Focus group + SurveyChiropractors

N = 36

N = 129

22%

77%

Indications for Maintenance Care

Chiropractors’ belief in Maintenance Care


Møller 2009 [11]Survey with open-ended questionChiropractorsN = 11NA, selected group

Definition of concept

Indications for Maintenance Care

Prevalence of Maintenance Care

Consultation patterns


Malmqvist 2009 [12]Structured workshop, a focus group discussionChiropractorsN = 15NAIndications for Maintenance Care

Sandnes 2010 [13]Observation in clinicsChiropractorsN = 868NA

Prevalence of Maintenance

Care Consultation patterns

Decision making


Hansen 2010 [15]SurveyChiropractorsN = 29772%

Indications for Maintenance Care

Prevalence of Maintenance Care

Chiropractor-related factors associated with Maintenance Care


Senna 2011 [18]RCTPatients from specialized hospital clinicN = 6065%Efficacy of intense follow up with SMT compared to a) SMT without follow up and b) sham SMT without follow up

Martel 2011 [19]RCT

Chiropractic

Patients

N = 9893%Efficacy of SMT compared to a) SMT plus exercise and b) attention

Cifuentes 2011 [21]Observational, databasePatients with workers’ compensation claimsN = 894NA, selected groupHealth care use for chiropractic patients compared to physician- and physical therapist- patients

Bringsli 2012 [10]

Observational +

Survey

Chiropractors

+

Chiropractic Maintenance Care-patients

N = 178

N = 373

NA

Not known

Rationale

Consultation patterns

Content


Axén 2013 [9]ObservationalChiropractorsN = 25296%Indications for Maintenance Care

Myburgh 2013 [14]Interview studyChiropractorsN = 10NA

Definition of concept

Indications for Maintenance Care Consultation patterns

Content Decision making


Eklund 2018 [16]RCTChiropractic patientsN = 31997%Efficacy of pre-scheduled treatments compared to treatments when needed.

Maiers 2018 [17]RCTChiropractic patientsN = 18090%Efficacy of SMT and exercises for 36 weeks compared to SMT and exercises for 12 weeks.
SMT Spinal Manipulative Therapy, NA Not applicable, RCT Randomized controlled trial