Table 2.

Pain Intensity Score (Primary Outcome)a,b Among Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain
Overall EffectIntervention Group, Mean (95% CI)Control Group, Mean (95% CI)Between-Group Difference, Mean (95% CI)cP Value
Facet joint trial, No. of participants125126
Overall−0.08 (−0.50 to 0.34).71
3 wk5.17 (4.73 to 5.61)5.92 (5.58 to 6.26)−0.41 (−1.02 to 0.19).18
6 wk5.19 (4.76 to 5.61)5.90 (5.53 to 6.26)−0.38 (−0.96 to 0.20).20
3 mo5.01 (4.59 to 5.43)5.44 (5.03 to 5.85)−0.18 (−0.76 to 0.40).55
6 mo4.61 (4.18 to 5.04)4.84 (4.38 to 5.30)−0.04 (−0.63 to 0.56).91
9 mo4.66 (4.20 to 5.00)4.73 (4.24 to 5.22)0.19 (−0.41 to 0.80).53
12 mo4.49 (4.00 to 4.97)4.44 (3.94 to 4.94)0.47 (−0.14 to 1.07).13
Sacroiliac joint trial, No. of participants116112
Overall−0.40 (−0.83 to 0.03).07
3 wk4.96 (4.51 to 5.40)6.00 (5.59 to 6.41)−0.96 (−1.63 to −0.29).005
6 wk5.22 (4.81 to 5.64)5.69 (5.31 to 6.08)−0.53 (−1.17 to 0.10).10
3 mo4.77 (4.31 to 5.24)5.45 (4.94 to 5.95)−0.71 (−1.35 to −0.06).03
6 mo4.50 (4.01 to 4.98)4.78 (4.24 to 5.31)−0.12 (−0.77 to 0.53).73
9 mo5.03 (4.55 to 5.51)4.97 (4.39 to 5.56)0.16 (−0.51 to 0.83).64
12 mo4.65 (4.16 to 5.13)4.84 (4.30 to 5.38)−0.07 (−0.74 to 0.60).83
Combination trial, No. of participants10399
Overall−0.21 (−0.76 to 0.35).47
3 wk5.45 (4.95 to 5.95)6.40 (5.91 to 6.89)−0.65 (−1.47 to 0.17).12
6 wk5.37 (4.89 to 5.85)6.09 (5.65 to 6.52)−0.40 (−1.14 to 0.34).29
3 mo4.77 (4.25 to 5.30)5.94 (5.42 to 6.45)−0.99 (−1.73 to −0.25).01
6 mo4.92 (4.39 to 5.44)4.95 (4.35 to 5.54)0.33 (−0.53 to 1.09).39
9 mo5.01 (4.47 to 5.56)5.25 (4.65 to 5.86)−0.05 (−0.82 to 0.73).90
12 mo4.85 (4.24 to 5.46)4.38 (3.73 to 5.03)0.69 (−0.10 to 1.49).09
aMeasured by numeric rating scale (score range, 0-10); a higher score indicates more severe symptoms.
bThe overall effect measures provide information over the total follow-up time of 12 mo, instead of the time × treatment effects.
cValues presented (for mean differences) are model estimates of linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept, and adjusted for outcome at baseline and age, sex, body mass index, education, smoking, marital status, back pain complaint history, and participant expectations. Regression coefficients can be interpreted as mean differences between interventions at a certain follow-up point compared with baseline.